inconsistencies in asset sizes for Games

Anonymous Master
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2019 9:02 am

Fri Mar 19, 2021 3:19 am

Brob wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:04 am
Anonymous Master wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:05 pm


Sorry, it's just that some people often complain of asset sizes for not being "realistic".

And you'd be surprised how big anime breasts can be, but whatever. More people prefer larger breasts than they care to admit, they just aren't as openly vocal about it.
So, quite frankly, the game-makers like Vadim and Kosmos should make more female characters with large boobs, not less.
Like the nintendolls, who shouldn't have gotten size reductions when compared to the first few games.
1. Yes, I'm aware that anime boobs can be just as big. We have an entire thread about "Anime Waifu" right now. Doesn't change how I feel about boulder size tits. Especially since I'm now under the impression that most of the MNF women are somehow related to each other because they pretty much have the same body design. Wouldn't really be all that surprised if that were the case since incest is incredibly popular around here.

2. Your argument is basically saying pander to the majority & forget about any diversity. Which is fine since MNF is pretty much doing that to begin with. I've been here long enough to know that MNF will continue to ignore me anyway.

3. The Nintendo Christmas games are the whole reason why I'm still here & I can tell you right now that their tits size is fine. Side effects from the mushrooms probably worn out & at some point, I wanted the women to assault Santa but I seem to be very few people who care about the series.
1. it's a fictional universe. And if anime/manga and comic fiction are any indication, a lot of females can have curvaceous and extremely well-endowed without issue or relation.

2. Bro, do you really need to potentially invoke any "real-life politics" here regarding "diversity"? Nobody is necessarily opposing diversity as long as it doesn't involve beastiality/monsters or incest or tentacles (since those are against the rules). Whether they are of different ethnicities or maybe are bisexual in terms of girl-on-girl action, it's perfectly cool. The only thing that largely doesn't need "diversity" is the asset sizes, because like it or not, pretty much everyone on this site is a pervert interested in hot, busty women involved in kinky sex games.
Besides, it's bad enough that all the feminism and "objectification of female appearances" complaints/arguments are essentially "butchering" all the sexy females in comic fiction and in western animated entertainment (even if it's freaking R-rated), but do we REALLY need to "bully" the game-makers into "Reducing" the asset sizes?
Just let it be, and the fact that the sexiest and most popular female characters on this site are all super-busty should be an indication that the game-makers should be keeping pretty much all their female characters super-busty.
This is more or less an online porn-game site, where sexy females with large assets are beloved, accepted, encouraged, and more or less the norm. So respectfully speaking, this is one of the last places to be complaining about asset sizes or needing "diversity" among asset sizes.

3. The Nintendolls games had largely consistent asset sizes for at least like 5 games before Kosmos suddenly changed art styles and reduced asset sizes for certain females, which was unnecessary.
And people love the series, but it's largely dependent on the game-makers actually working on it to see more games involving it.
Brob
Posts: 155
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:14 pm

Sat Mar 20, 2021 3:00 am

Anonymous Master wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 3:19 am
2. Bro, do you really need to potentially invoke any "real-life politics" here regarding "diversity"? Nobody is necessarily opposing diversity as long as it doesn't involve beastiality/monsters or incest or tentacles (since those are against the rules). Whether they are of different ethnicities or maybe are bisexual in terms of girl-on-girl action, it's perfectly cool. The only thing that largely doesn't need "diversity" is the asset sizes, because like it or not, pretty much everyone on this site is a pervert interested in hot, busty women involved in kinky sex games.
Besides, it's bad enough that all the feminism and "objectification of female appearances" complaints/arguments are essentially "butchering" all the sexy females in comic fiction and in western animated entertainment (even if it's freaking R-rated), but do we REALLY need to "bully" the game-makers into "Reducing" the asset sizes?
Just let it be, and the fact that the sexiest and most popular female characters on this site are all super-busty should be an indication that the game-makers should be keeping pretty much all their female characters super-busty.
This is more or less an online porn-game site, where sexy females with large assets are beloved, accepted, encouraged, and more or less the norm. So respectfully speaking, this is one of the last places to be complaining about asset sizes or needing "diversity" among asset sizes.
........

So I think this is what I need finally leave MNF or at the very least stop interacting with the community & being on the website for a while.

I've been ignored, denied, & mistreated for over a decade & yet I continue to support them. I'm not entirely sure why since slowly over the last 5 years I remember the last time I've seen any of my fetishes or any lesbian actions. I've drafted up ideas for the Nintendoll series & none of them came to fruition. Yet I'm being told that not only is it ok to ignore me, which I already said it's fine since I already know I'm the minority, but it's actually should be encouraged to ignore my interests. On top of that, my interest & fetishes are political? I've sexualized & objectified women because I'm on a God damn porno website. Just because I'm not crazy about boulders-sized tits doesn't mean I'm an SJW damn it! I used to take so much solace knowing that MNF was one of the few places I can get away with being a pervert & jerk off in peace, but now that's not even a thing! Maybe when I'm talking about diversity I'm actually talking about how I also want Officer Juggs to unique in her super-busty design instead of how everyone & literally their mothers having the same body design that makes Juggs stand out as a design. The diversity I just want different body types & sizes! Not their ethnicities, not their gender, their design as fictional characters that I am objectifying!

There's barely been any clothing fetish, I'm indifferent to the parodies that MNF barely does now, & I can't think of lesbian & bisexual games they've done recently. I didn't even get a Nintendoll game this year or last year.I already don't know how to play the old games & I barely voice my opinion because I have this disillusioned any time I would, my ideas would just get ignored because of any criticism I would have. Even though I already know at best 10% that any of my ideas would ever be accepted. I spend days & weeks trying to draft my ideas over the decade & even subscribe to have my chances for it to finally happen only to be ignored. Meanwhile, commissions that barely have any sentences, sometimes not even sentences, win the polls & other forum ideas get made but I can barely get any feedback for any mine. Now I'm being told that I'm an SJW for wanting different women's design because I said want more diversity.

I just handle it anymore. I'm just going to post my last ideas & leave. Grammars be damned
User avatar
mnf_vadim
Site Admin
Posts: 896
Joined: Mon May 29, 2017 5:00 pm

Sat Mar 20, 2021 7:14 am

You are always welcome to return back. We never ignored you or anyone else, we just don't have enough resources to make games for each of you guys. For instance, about Nintendolls. Yes, we love this game series as well. We totally removed Nintendo name from the title, but still
we are afraid to make this game series cuz we know that Nintendo lawyer are good and CCBILL isn't going to dig deeply, they just check it once and will ask to remove them without accepting any appeals.

Still, I believe that we try to make as many diversity among characters as we can, but we should keep the big-boobed characters as our main heroines.

PS: Once again, you are always welcome back.
BakaIsBack
Posts: 304
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2018 9:52 am

Sat Mar 20, 2021 12:19 pm

Anonymous Master wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 3:19 am
Brob wrote:
Fri Mar 19, 2021 1:04 am
Anonymous Master wrote:
Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:05 pm


Sorry, it's just that some people often complain of asset sizes for not being "realistic".

And you'd be surprised how big anime breasts can be, but whatever. More people prefer larger breasts than they care to admit, they just aren't as openly vocal about it.
So, quite frankly, the game-makers like Vadim and Kosmos should make more female characters with large boobs, not less.
Like the nintendolls, who shouldn't have gotten size reductions when compared to the first few games.
1. Yes, I'm aware that anime boobs can be just as big. We have an entire thread about "Anime Waifu" right now. Doesn't change how I feel about boulder size tits. Especially since I'm now under the impression that most of the MNF women are somehow related to each other because they pretty much have the same body design. Wouldn't really be all that surprised if that were the case since incest is incredibly popular around here.

2. Your argument is basically saying pander to the majority & forget about any diversity. Which is fine since MNF is pretty much doing that to begin with. I've been here long enough to know that MNF will continue to ignore me anyway.

3. The Nintendo Christmas games are the whole reason why I'm still here & I can tell you right now that their tits size is fine. Side effects from the mushrooms probably worn out & at some point, I wanted the women to assault Santa but I seem to be very few people who care about the series.
1. it's a fictional universe. And if anime/manga and comic fiction are any indication, a lot of females can have curvaceous and extremely well-endowed without issue or relation.

2. Bro, do you really need to potentially invoke any "real-life politics" here regarding "diversity"? Nobody is necessarily opposing diversity as long as it doesn't involve beastiality/monsters or incest or tentacles (since those are against the rules). Whether they are of different ethnicities or maybe are bisexual in terms of girl-on-girl action, it's perfectly cool. The only thing that largely doesn't need "diversity" is the asset sizes, because like it or not, pretty much everyone on this site is a pervert interested in hot, busty women involved in kinky sex games.
Besides, it's bad enough that all the feminism and "objectification of female appearances" complaints/arguments are essentially "butchering" all the sexy females in comic fiction and in western animated entertainment (even if it's freaking R-rated), but do we REALLY need to "bully" the game-makers into "Reducing" the asset sizes?
Just let it be, and the fact that the sexiest and most popular female characters on this site are all super-busty should be an indication that the game-makers should be keeping pretty much all their female characters super-busty.
This is more or less an online porn-game site, where sexy females with large assets are beloved, accepted, encouraged, and more or less the norm. So respectfully speaking, this is one of the last places to be complaining about asset sizes or needing "diversity" among asset sizes.

3. The Nintendolls games had largely consistent asset sizes for at least like 5 games before Kosmos suddenly changed art styles and reduced asset sizes for certain females, which was unnecessary.
And people love the series, but it's largely dependent on the game-makers actually working on it to see more games involving it.
Agreed.
Post Reply